ISSN 1003-8035 CN 11-2852/P
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CSCD收录期刊
  • Caj-cd规范获奖期刊
  • Scopus 收录期刊
  • DOAJ 收录期刊
  • GeoRef收录期刊
欢迎扫码关注“i环境微平台”

基于SBAS-InSAR技术的内蒙古高家梁矿区采空地面塌陷动态特征研究

薛鑫磊, 王志乾, 乔港介, 李光柱, 白小军, 范军富, 籍进柱

薛鑫磊,王志乾,乔港介,等. 基于SBAS-InSAR技术的内蒙古高家梁矿区采空地面塌陷动态特征研究[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2024,35(0): 1-11. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202402011
引用本文: 薛鑫磊,王志乾,乔港介,等. 基于SBAS-InSAR技术的内蒙古高家梁矿区采空地面塌陷动态特征研究[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2024,35(0): 1-11. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202402011
XUE Xinlei,WANG Zhiqian,QIAO Gangjie,et al. Study of dynamic characteristics of ground collapse caused by mining in Gaojialiang coal mine, Inner Mongolia, using SBAS-InSAR technology[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2024,35(0): 1-11. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202402011
Citation: XUE Xinlei,WANG Zhiqian,QIAO Gangjie,et al. Study of dynamic characteristics of ground collapse caused by mining in Gaojialiang coal mine, Inner Mongolia, using SBAS-InSAR technology[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2024,35(0): 1-11. DOI: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202402011

基于SBAS-InSAR技术的内蒙古高家梁矿区采空地面塌陷动态特征研究

基金项目: 矿山地质环境和灾害监测预警关键技术研究技术服务项目(PH2023000056);内蒙古工业大学博士科研启动项目(BS2020024)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    薛鑫磊(2000—),男,山东烟台人,地质工程专业硕士研究生,主要从事矿山地质环境研究。E-mail:2521188202@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    籍进柱(1989—),男,壮族,河北邯郸人,地球化学专业博士,副教授,研究方向为遥感地质与矿山地质环境。E-mail:jijinzhu@imut.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: TD325;P694

Study of dynamic characteristics of ground collapse caused by mining in Gaojialiang coal mine, Inner Mongolia, using SBAS-InSAR technology

  • 摘要:

    采空造成的地面塌陷是井工矿开采中最常见的问题,若不及时监测治理可能会影响到整体和整体环境。针对传统沉降监测方法难以在地表高低起伏、沟谷纵横的丘陵地貌矿区开展的问题,文章以内蒙古高家梁煤矿203盘区的20314、20313和20312工作面为研究对象,收集2018年4月至2020年12月期间12景Sentinel-1雷达影像,用短基线集差分干涉测量技术(small baseline subset InSAR,SBAS-InSAR)进行处理,获取采空地面塌陷平均位移速度、时序形变量等数据,进而分析研究区动态特征。结果表明:研究区采空地面塌陷整体平均位移速度呈现出“北部快,南部慢”的特征,最大沉降速为−17.2 mm/a,位于20313工作面的北部三分之一处;采空地面塌陷时序形变量整体呈现出“由南向北,由西向东”的特征,符合实际工作面开采方向和顺序,主要沉降区分布在20314和20313工作面的北部,最大形变量达到了−106 mm。实践表明:SBAS-InSAR技术在丘陵地貌的矿区开展采空地面塌陷监测具有较强的技术优势且效果良好,为矿区采空地面塌陷监测提供方法支持。

    Abstract:

    Ground collapse due to mining activities is a prevalent issue in underground coal mining processes. Without timely monitoring and control, it can adversely affect the surrounding structures and the environment. Addressing the challenges of traditional subsidence monitoring methods in the mining areas with uneven hilly terrain, this study focuses on the 20314, 20313, and 20312 working faces within the 203 panel of Gaojialiang coal mine area, Inner Mongolia. It employs 12 images of Sentinel-1 radar from April 2018 to December 2020 processed using the small baseline subset differential interferometry InSAR (SBAS-InSAR) technique to derive average displacement velocities and temporal subsidence data in the study area. The study analyzes the dynamic characteristics of subsidence in the area. The results show that the overall subsidence rate is higher in the northern part of the study area compared to the south, with the maximum subsidence rate of approximately −17.2 mm/year observed in the northern third of the 20313 working face. The subsidence pattern generally progresses from south to north and from west to east, corresponding to the actual mining sequence. Major subsidence areas are concentrated in the northern portions of the 20314 and 20313 working faces, with maximum subsidence reaching about −106 mm. The application shows that SBAS-InSAR technology has effective results and significantly technical advantages in monitoring land subsidence in hilly mining areas, thereby providing certain method support for land subsidence monitoring in mining areas.

  • 强降雨作用下,山地丘陵区极易发生山洪、崩塌、滑坡、泥石流等地质灾害,并且可能阻断河流,形成堰塞湖,威胁堰塞体上下游人民生命财产安全[13]。据统计,近年来我国地质灾害造成的年死亡人数达200~400人[4]。山地丘陵地区由降雨引发的滑坡、泥石流灾害频发,造成严重的人员伤亡和经济财产损失[5]。在自然降雨条件下,山区中堆积的松散土体会在强降雨作用下诱发滑坡和泥石流灾害。大体积滑坡和泥石流汇入江河后,极易堵塞河道形成堰塞坝,壅高上游水位,堰塞坝一旦溃决将在下游造成巨大的洪水灾害,形成滑坡/泥石流-堰塞湖-溃决洪水灾害链[68]

    降雨是滑坡/泥石流-堰塞湖-溃决洪水灾害链的主要诱发因素,尤其是强度大、持续时间长的降雨往往是引发滑坡/泥石流-堰塞湖-溃决洪水灾害链的关键控制因素[911]。通过降雨试验揭示降雨诱发滑坡/泥石流-堰塞湖-溃决洪水灾害链的机理对防灾减灾工作具有重要意义。目前,众多学者采用物理模型试验揭示降雨诱发地质灾害的机理,王如宾等[12]基于人工模拟降雨室内大型滑坡模型试验,揭示了降雨诱发滑坡变形破坏机理。胡华等[13]设计了降雨滑坡模拟试验,研究了降雨强度和斜坡坡度对滑塌破坏的影响。部分学者通过现场试验来揭示降雨诱发地质灾害的机理,谭建民等[14]开展了降雨边坡破坏现场试验,探究了降雨作用下花岗岩风化土坡的失稳机制。周中等[15]综合通过人工降雨模拟试验和原位综合监测手段,探究了降雨条件下土石混合体滑坡的失稳机理。王刚等[16]开展降雨型滑坡现场试验研究,探究了不同雨强条件下天然黄土边坡的入渗规律及变形破坏模式。詹良通等[17]对非饱和膨胀土进行了降雨试验和原位监测,揭示了降雨入渗对边坡失稳的影响。综上可知,目前在利用模型试验和现场试验揭示降雨滑坡诱发机理方面已经开展了大量研究,取得了一些新的认识,但是,室内模型试验存在尺寸效应,难以还原灾害的真实情况,而现有现场试验多不是在灾害现场开展的原位试验。因此,在灾害现场开展原位试验对进一步探究降雨诱发滑坡、泥石流灾害机理至关重要。

    本文选取2020年发生在四川省凉山州甘洛县黑西洛沟的山洪-滑坡-泥石流-堰塞湖灾害链残留边坡开展现场人工降雨试验,综合利用三维激光扫描仪、孔隙水压力计、土壤含水率传感器、EDS能谱分析等多种设备和方法,探究降雨诱发该处滑坡的机理,以期为当地的防灾减灾提供有益借鉴。

    黑西洛沟位于四川省凉山州甘洛县,为尼日河右侧的一条小山沟,长度约5 km。经现场调查,沟道两侧松散物源分布广泛,植被不发育。在非汛期,沟内仅有较小溪流流出,在枯水季节沟内偶尔断流。2020年8月31日上午8时,在持续的降雨作用下,黑西洛沟内发生了山洪-滑坡-泥石流-堰塞湖灾害链。灾害发生时,黑西洛沟内原有松散物源被山洪裹挟带走,并在运移过程中不断铲刮沟道底部物源,导致沟边两侧边坡失稳,逐渐演变为滑坡灾害。沟内通道不断下切过程中,两侧岸坡持续垮塌,崩塌体进入沟道后,滑坡规模急速扩大,最终演变为泥石流灾害。大量泥石流物源几乎呈垂直状态冲入尼日河,形成堰塞坝,堵塞尼日河,如图1(a)所示。经现场测量,形成的堰塞坝沿河道纵向方向长度约200 m,顺河向长度约为400 m,高度约30 m,堰塞坝体积约100×104 m3。堰塞坝自然溃决后冲毁下游场镇、村庄、学校和道路,造成阿兹觉乡一千余名群众受灾,3人失踪,黑西洛沟口的成昆铁路桥梁被冲毁,成昆铁路断道数月,堰塞坝下游的国道G245约1.2 km道路和多处桥梁被掩埋、冲毁,多栋房屋损毁,经济损失严重。堰塞坝材料在下游1 km范围内淤积,导致下游阿兹觉村挖哈组、乃牛组两个组被完全掩埋。

    图  1  黑西洛沟堰塞坝全貌和沟内上游影像
    Figure  1.  Overview of the barrier dam and upper reaches image inside Hexilou gully

    通过现场调查和资料收集,本次滑坡-泥石流-堰塞湖灾害链是一次典型的“小水大灾”灾害,本文聚焦该灾害链中的滑坡灾害,通过现场降雨试验和室内EDS能谱分析,以期揭示降雨作用下边坡侵蚀破坏的发生机理。

    本次现场模型试验在2020年黑西洛沟灾害后的残余边坡上进行,试验边坡高度约为2.2 m,宽约2.0 m,坡长约3.0 m,天然坡度约为49°,如图1(b)所示。降雨试验前对坡面进行简单平整,清除坡面杂草、大块石等影响坡面径流和入渗的障碍物。现场筛分试验测得黑西洛沟内松散堆积体的颗粒级配曲线如图2所示[18]

    图  2  黑西洛沟土体颗粒级配曲线
    Figure  2.  Particle size distribution curve of soil in Hexiluo gully

    降雨装置主要包括支架、雨水输送管道、喷头和雨量计。喷头设置在边坡顶部并延伸至坡面,喷头顶部可通过调节流量的方式模拟不同的雨强。

    试验中设计了两排喷头,试验中经过多次调试,最终确定喷头间距约为0.7 m,每排喷头间距约为0.5 m,经现场观察,这一间距能够确保坡面降雨的均匀性。雨量计放置在边坡试验区,位于试验降雨区内,以实时测量坡面的降雨量,测得值能代表试验区的平均雨量,降雨试验装置如图3所示。

    图  3  现场降雨试验装置
    Figure  3.  Field rainfall testing device

    试验中数据采集设备包括孔隙水压力传感器、土壤含水率传感器、雨量计以及三维激光扫描仪,其中孔隙水压力传感器3个,土壤含水率传感器3个。孔隙水压力传感器量程是10 kPa,准确度误差≤0.5 F∙S,土壤含水率传感器测量范围0~100%。黑西洛沟滑坡灾害的主要原因就是堆积体浅层物源浸水后被冲出,故为了与灾害实际情况相似,本次试验所用传感器埋入边坡表层,深度为0.3 m。孔隙水压力计和土壤含水率传感器放入预挖的孔洞后,利用坡体原样土回填后进行人工夯实,保证夯实后孔内的土体与天然状态一致。边坡尺寸和传感器埋设的位置如图4所示。三维激光扫描仪立于边坡的正面,通过不同阶段的扫描,以获取降雨过程中边坡的三维地形点云数据,由此识别边坡的变形破坏过程。

    图  4  传感器布置示意图(单位:mm)
    Figure  4.  Sensor layout diagram (unit: mm)

    根据甘洛县水利局的实测数据,本次灾害发生前后黑西洛沟临近监测站点的降雨数据如图5所示。临近监测站点位于苏雄镇,距离灾害点约500 m,本站点降雨数据可以代表真实的降雨量。灾害发生时当地已连续降雨约15 h,持续降雨导致沟内的松散物源浸水饱和,并最终被沟内山洪裹挟冲出,诱发链生的滑坡、泥石流和堰塞湖灾害,降雨是此次灾害链发生的主要诱因。为了更好地分析灾害链发生机理,试验降雨量尽量保证与灾害实际情况相符。受现场试验条件限制,经雨量计实测,此次现场试验共计降雨量为28 mm,降雨历时150 min,小时降雨量为11.2mm,试验小时降雨量与灾害发生时的降雨量接近,如图5所示。

    图  5  黑西洛沟临近站点实测降雨量过程
    Figure  5.  Process of measured rainfall data at the adjacent site in Hexiluo gully

    本研究通过对试验数据的分析,揭示降雨条件下黑西洛沟内残余边坡内部的孔隙水压力和土壤含水率变化规律,同时通过三维激光扫描仪精准识别边坡表面的变形破坏过程。

    根据现场监测结果,得出降雨过程中边坡内孔隙水压力随降雨历时的变化规律,如图6所示。

    图  6  孔隙水压力随降雨历时的变化规律
    Figure  6.  Variation of pore water pressure with rainfall duration in Hexiluo gully

    图6可知,边坡体内孔隙水压力的变化过程大致可分为三个阶段:加速上升、下降和趋于稳定。降雨初期,雨水未入渗至坡体内部,孔隙水压力传感器监测数据未发生明显变化。随着降雨的持续进行,雨水在入渗过程中逐渐汇聚在坡面,形成坡面径流和坡内渗流,导致孔隙水压力开始变化,其中A1和A3孔隙水压力传感器在40 min至50 min陡然增加,边坡表面出现冲刷痕迹。继续降雨,边坡表面产生拉裂缝,雨水通过裂缝

    不断渗入坡体内部,孔隙水压力持续上升,致使边坡的抗剪强度由于有效应力的减少而降低。降雨后期,边坡表面出现局部塌陷,坡体内部渗透路径发生变化,导致孔隙水压力开始下降。

    降雨35~50 min时间段内,A1和A3传感器的孔隙水压力开始增加,坡面有明显的降雨冲蚀痕迹。继续降雨,A1和A3传感器的数据持续上升。降雨65 min后,A2孔隙水压力传感器才开始快速增加,并且此位置的含水率传感器也有明显响应,含水率曲线开始发生变化,土体的含水率开始逐渐上升,含水率和孔隙水压力变化一致。此时坡面的雨水冲蚀痕迹加深,侵蚀破坏范围扩大,土体颗粒被水流带走堆积在坡脚,整个坡面有明显的冲刷破坏。继续进行降雨,边坡土体开裂,雨水沿着拉裂缝进入坡体内部,孔隙水软化了边坡土体,土体有效应力减少,边坡稳定性下降,坡面产生了明显的局部塌陷,内部渗流场发生变化,孔隙水压力开始下降,直至不再改变。

    不同位置的孔隙水压力传感器变化有明显差异,原因是,A3传感器位于坡顶,A1传感器位于边坡中部,降雨过程中,A1传感器由于受到降雨入渗和上部土体水分沿拉裂缝入渗的补给,上升速度更快,孔隙水压力相较更大。A2孔隙水压力传感器数据明显滞后,因为该传感器周围有无法清理的大块石,降雨过程中,雨水流经坡面,块石改变了雨水的渗流路径,导致其渗透速度变慢。

    持续降雨条件下边坡不同位置的土壤含水率变化规律如图7所示。

    图  7  土壤含水率随降雨历时的变化规律
    Figure  7.  Variation of soil water content with rainfall duration in Hexiluo gully

    图7可知,降雨过程中,含水率持续增大,并最终趋于稳定。土体含水率随降雨历时共经历3个变化阶段:基本不变、加速增大和保持稳定。在降雨初期,边坡雨水入渗量较少,各个监测点的土壤含水率均无明显变化,坡体处在基本稳定状态。随着降雨历时的增加,雨水逐渐从坡面向

    坡体内部渗透,土壤含水率开始增加,降雨入渗使得土体由非饱和状态向饱和状态过渡,坡面土体遇水软化,强度降低,表面出现多处裂缝,在土体内部形成渗流通道,B2和B3位置的土壤含水率处于快速增长阶段,降雨后期,B1传感器才有明显的变化,最后土壤含水率都保持平稳状态。出现这种现象的原因是,雨水流经坡体表面,表层土体被冲刷而流失,水分子与土粒在表面形成阻碍入渗的结合水膜,土体内部气体无法排出,使得雨水难以下渗,边坡内的水分保持平衡,土壤含水率达到稳定,但此时边坡土体并未达到饱和状态。

    土壤含水率明显变化的这段时间内,含水率传感器埋设位置的孔隙水压力也在迅速上升。降雨50 min左右,雨水流过坡面形成冲沟,坡面产生侵蚀破坏,如图8(a)所示。B3土壤含水率传感器开始快速增加,此时该位置的孔隙水压力也处在快速上升阶段,土体抗侵蚀性下降,坡体表面出现雨水冲蚀痕迹,发生降雨侵蚀破坏;降雨90 min左右,B3含水率传感器达到最大值并保持不变,此时土体孔隙水压力也达到稳定值,不再改变,边坡上部土体侵蚀破坏范围扩大,土体稳定性降低。降雨后期,B1传感器才开始加速上升。整个坡面的侵蚀进一步扩大,表面出现局部塌陷,如图8(b)所示。整个降雨过程中,雨水聚集在边坡表面,流经边坡使其受到侵蚀破坏,同时在降雨过程中,坡面产生裂缝,形成渗流优势通道,更有利于雨水的入渗,使得土体含水率不断增大。

    图  8  降雨过程中边坡变形破坏特征
    Figure  8.  Slope deformation and failure characteristics during rainfall

    降雨试验过程中的边坡坡面形态变化过程如图9所示。试验过程中,分别在持续降雨45,90,135 min三个时间点对坡面的三维形体进行扫描,获取坡面点云数据,经多期作差后,可以识别出边坡不同阶段的坡面三维形态变化,降雨过程中坡面形态变化云图如图10所示。

    图  9  降雨过程中坡面形态图
    Figure  9.  Morphology map of the Slope surface during rainfall
    图  10  边坡坡面变形云图(负值表示冲刷,正值表示淤积)
    Figure  10.  Nephogram of side slope deformation (negative values indicate erosion, positive values indicate deposition)

    图10可知,持续降雨过程中,边坡的破坏过程具体表现为:持续降雨45 min后,坡面出现了侵蚀破坏,雨水在坡面聚集,形成表面径流,带走坡体表面的松散颗粒。从边坡坡面变形云图可以看到,边坡表面有明显的冲刷区域,被冲刷掉的土体堆积在了坡脚。随着时间与累计降雨量的增大,试验边坡坡面破坏开始逐渐明显,坡面的冲刷痕迹不断加深,冲刷范围不断扩大,边坡上部土体流失,在边坡中部位置发生局部垮塌现象,如图9所示。这段时间,土体内部孔隙水压力也在迅速增大,变形破坏与孔隙水压力之间响应关系明显。降雨120 min后,如图9(b)所示,边坡前缘的冲沟逐渐加宽加深,表面出现多处拉裂缝,雨水沿着裂缝进入土体内部,边坡变形破坏范围不断扩大,此时土壤含水率陡然增加,边坡产生局部垮塌,土体内部渗透路径发生改变,孔隙水压力开始下降。持续降雨135 min后,由图10可知,边坡表面有更多的土体流失且在坡脚堆积。从坡面形态图中可以看出,位移变化的对应位置有裂缝产生和局部小范围的塌陷,雨水的冲蚀痕迹明显,坡脚堆积土体明显增多。

    基于多次三维激光扫描获取的点云数据,通过计算得到本次整个降雨试验过程中边坡坡面的冲刷物源体积约为10.0 dm3

    为进一步揭示该残余边坡的变形破坏原因,对试验土样开展了X射线能谱分析(EDS)测试。能谱仪配合扫描电子显微镜与透射电子显微镜的

    使用,可以获取土样成分的元素种类及含量,其测试结果如表1所示。

    表  1  边坡物质成分组成表
    Table  1.  Composition of slope material components
    元素 质量百分比/% 原子百分比/% 标准样品标签
    C 8.08 12.91 C
    O 49.38 59.23 SiO2
    Na 1.84 1.54 Albite(钠长石)
    Mg 0.39 0.31 MgO
    Al 6.96 4.95 Al2O3
    Si 26.51 18.11 SiO2
    K 3.72 1.82 KBr
    Ca 0.28 0.14 Wollastonite(硅石灰)
    Ti 0.36 0.14 Ti
    Fe 2.49 0.86 Fe
    总量 100 100
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格

    表1可知,边坡的物质成分较为复杂,主要化学成分为SiO2和Al2O3,含少量Mg、Fe、Na元素。物质组成表明边坡土体中含有伊利石和高岭石等黏土矿物,而伊利石和高岭石是影响膨胀土性质的主要矿物。膨胀土吸水膨胀,遇水崩解或软化,抗冲刷性能差。因此,含有伊利石和高岭石等黏性矿物的边坡表面极易吸水膨胀,抗冲刷能力降低,导致边坡表层土体强度急剧衰减,在降雨作用下极易冲刷破坏。

    图9可知,降雨120 min后,边坡表面出现了侵蚀破坏和局部塌陷,土体被雨水带走堆积在坡脚,整体稳定性受到影响,原因在于:非饱和膨胀土在长时间的持续降雨作用下,雨水入渗会使得浅表层土体孔隙水压力上升和吸力降低。孔隙水压力的升高会导致坡体滑动力增加,且土体的有效应力下降,边坡强度降低,边坡坡面发生侵蚀冲刷。同时吸力下降将使得土层发生膨胀,含有高岭石、伊利石等黏性矿物的边坡土体会因为吸水膨胀而软化,导致土体的抗冲刷性能下降,土颗粒之间的黏聚力随时间而降低,在重力和雨水裹挟作用下,导致边坡出现了多处拉裂缝,拉裂缝的产生使得雨水进一步入渗,雨水充满裂缝产生水压力导致边坡强度降低,加剧边坡的破坏,最终边坡坡面产生冲刷破坏和局部塌陷。

    (1)降雨作用下,边坡土壤含水率发生明显增加;同时孔隙水压力在降雨期间也会增大,后期土体发生变形破坏,孔隙水压力开始下降。

    (2)三维激光扫描结果表明:边坡表面有明显的冲刷区域且范围不断扩大,持续降雨导致边坡的抗侵蚀能力变弱,土体被雨水冲刷而流失,流失的土颗粒堆积在坡脚。整个降雨试验过程中,边坡坡面的冲刷物源体积约为10.0 dm3

    (3)EDS测试结果表明边坡土体含有伊利石和高岭石等黏性矿物,遇水后极易发生膨胀而软化,导致土体黏聚力降低,边坡抗侵蚀能力变弱,边坡产生拉裂缝,雨水充满裂缝产生水压力加剧边坡破坏,恶化了边坡稳定性,最终发生冲刷破坏和局部塌陷。

    (4)试验对揭示降雨作用下边坡侵蚀破坏机理具有重要意义。降雨入渗使得边坡土体内的含水率和孔隙水压力发生波动陡增,导致土体基质吸力减小,土体软化,从而导致边坡土体强度降低是边坡发生侵蚀破坏的主要原因。

  • 图  1   高家梁矿区位置

    Figure  1.   Location of Gaojialiang Mining Area

    图  2   研究区SAR影像和DEM

    Figure  2.   SAR image and DEM of the study area

    图  3   时间-位置和时间-基线连接图

    Figure  3.   Time-position and time-baseline plot

    图  4   技术路线图

    Figure  4.   Technology roadmap

    图  5   研究区平均位移速度及分布直方图

    Figure  5.   Average displacement rate and distribution histogram of the study area

    图  6   研究区采空塌陷时序图

    Figure  6.   The collapse sequence in the study area

    图  7   研究区累计形变量及分布直方图

    Figure  7.   Cumulative subsidence and distribution histogram of the study area

    图  8   测线布置图

    Figure  8.   Survey line layout map

    图  9   20314、20313和20312工作面南北向测线(Z1、Z2和Z3)累计沉降曲线图

    Figure  9.   Cumulative Subsidence Curve Chart of North-South Survey Lines (Z1, Z2, Z3) for Working Faces 20314, 20313, and 20312

    图  10   东西向测线(Q1)累计沉降曲线图

    Figure  10.   Cumulative subsidence curve chart of East-west survey line (Q1)

    图  11   (a)研究区典型裂缝位置;(b)典型裂缝照片

    Figure  11.   (a) Location of typical cracks in the study area; (b) photo of typical cracks

    表  1   工作面详细情况

    Table  1   Details of working faces

    工作面 长/m 宽/m 开采时间 停采时间 开采深度/m 煤层厚度/m 采深采厚比
    20314 1600 280 2017年 2018年初 171.30~186.76 3.98~3.99 42.9~46.9
    20313 2000 290 2018年初 2019年初 178.69~189.98 4.20~4.24 42.5~44.8
    20312 2600 290 2019年初 2019年末 140.45~205.07 3.78~4.24 33.1~54.3
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   SAR数据参数表

    Table  2   Parameters of SAR data

    编号 轨道号 日期 成像模式 极化方式 飞行方式 入射角/(°)
    1 026158 2018-04-12 IW VV 升轨 42.02
    2 026683 2018-07-05 IW VV 升轨 42.02
    3 027208 2018-10-09 IW VV 升轨 42.02
    4 027558 2018-12-08 IW VV 升轨 42.02
    5 028083 2019-03-02 IW VV 升轨 42.02
    6 028433 2019-06-06 IW VV 升轨 42.02
    7 028958 2019-09-10 IW VV 升轨 42.02
    8 029308 2019-11-21 IW VV 升轨 42.02
    9 029833 2020-02-13 IW VV 升轨 42.02
    10 030008 2020-04-25 IW VV 升轨 42.02
    11 030183 2020-09-04 IW VV 升轨 42.02
    12 030708 2020-11-15 IW VV 升轨 42.02
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 王毅,黄同新,汪宝存,等. 巨野矿区Sentinel-1A雷达影像PS-InSAR地面形变监测[J]. 自动化与仪器仪表,2019(7):120 − 123. [WANG Yi,HUANG Tongxin,WANG Baocun,et al. Surface deformation monitoring of PS-InSAR in Juye mining based on Sentinel-1A radar images[J]. Automation & Instrumentation,2019(7):120 − 123. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    WANG Yi, HUANG Tongxin, WANG Baocun, et al. Surface deformation monitoring of PS-InSAR in Juye mining based on Sentinel-1A radar images[J]. Automation & Instrumentation, 2019(7): 120 − 123. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [2] 范立民,吴群英,彭捷,等. 黄河中游大型煤炭基地地质环境监测思路和方法[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(5):1417 − 1427. [FAN Limin,WU Qunying,PENG Jie,et al. Thoughts and methods of geological environment monitoring for large coal bases in the middle reaches of the Yellow River[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(5):1417 − 1427. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    FAN Limin, WU Qunying, PENG Jie, et al. Thoughts and methods of geological environment monitoring for large coal bases in the middle reaches of the Yellow River[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2021, 46(5): 1417 − 1427. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [3] 黄翌,汪云甲,王猛,等. 黄土高原山地采煤沉陷对土壤侵蚀的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2014,30(1):228 − 235. [HUANG Yi,WANG Yunjia,WANG Meng,et al. Effect of mining subsidence on soil erosion in mountainous area of the Loess Plateau[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2014,30(1):228 − 235. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    HUANG Yi, WANG Yunjia, WANG Meng, et al. Effect of mining subsidence on soil erosion in mountainous area of the Loess Plateau[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(1): 228 − 235. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [4] 马飞. 矿区沉降InSAR监测与预测方法研究[D]. 西安:长安大学,2020. [MA Fei. Research on in sar monitoring and prediction method of mine subsidence[D]. Xi’an:Changan University,2020. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    MA Fei. Research on in sar monitoring and prediction method of mine subsidence[D]. Xi’an: Changan University, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [5] 牛敏杰,师芸,张童康,等. 基于SBAS-InSAR技术的多工作面矿区地表形变特征[J]. 中国科技论文,2022,17(5):581 − 588. [NIU Minjie,SHI Yun,ZHANG Tongkang,et al. Surface deformation characteristics of multiples working faces mining area based on SBAS-InSAR technology[J]. China Sciencepaper,2022,17(5):581 − 588. (in Chinese with English abstract)] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-2783.2022.05.016

    NIU Minjie, SHI Yun, ZHANG Tongkang, et al. Surface deformation characteristics of multiples working faces mining area based on SBAS-InSAR technology[J]. China Sciencepaper, 2022, 17(5): 581 − 588. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-2783.2022.05.016

    [6] 滕超群. 基于InSAR技术的形变灾害监测预测方法及其应用研究[D]. 淮南:安徽理工大学,2021. [TENG Chaoqun. Research on deformation disaster monitoring and prediction method based on InSAR and its application[D]. Huainan:Anhui University of Science & Technology,2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    TENG Chaoqun. Research on deformation disaster monitoring and prediction method based on InSAR and its application[D]. Huainan: Anhui University of Science & Technology, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [7] 齐麟. 基于时序InSAR技术的北京平原区地面沉降监测与分析[D]. 青岛:山东科技大学,2020. [QI Lin. Ground subsidence monitoring and analysis in Beijing Plain area based on time series InSAR technique[D]. Qingdao:Shandong University of Science and Technology,2020. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    QI Lin. Ground subsidence monitoring and analysis in Beijing Plain area based on time series InSAR technique[D]. Qingdao: Shandong University of Science and Technology, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [8] 刘文涛. 基于时序InSAR技术的矿区地面沉降监测与分析[D]. 西安:西安科技大学,2020. [LIU Wentao. Monitoring and analysis of land subsidence in mining area based on time series InSAR technology[D]. Xi’an:Xi’an University of Science and Technology,2020. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LIU Wentao. Monitoring and analysis of land subsidence in mining area based on time series InSAR technology[D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Science and Technology, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [9] 刘国祥. InSAR原理与应用[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2019. [LIU Guoxiang. Principle and application of InSAR[M]. Beijing:Science Press,2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LIU Guoxiang. Principle and application of InSAR[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [10]

    FERRETTI A,PRATI C,ROCCA F. Nonlinear subsidence rate estimation using permanent scatterers in differential SAR interferometry[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,2000,38(5):2202 − 2212. DOI: 10.1109/36.868878

    [11]

    BERARDINO P,FORNARO G,LANARI R,et al. A new algorithm for surface deformation monitoring based on small baseline differential SAR interferograms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,2002,40(11):2375 − 2383. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2002.803792

    [12] 马顶. 基于SBAS-InSAR的山西省西山煤田地面沉降监测及对地表状况的影响[D]. 太原:太原理工大学,2022. [MA Ding. Ground subsidence monitoring based on SBAS-InSAR technology in Xishan coalfield,Shanxi Province and its influence on surface condition[D]. Taiyuan:Taiyuan University of Technology,2022. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    MA Ding. Ground subsidence monitoring based on SBAS-InSAR technology in Xishan coalfield, Shanxi Province and its influence on surface condition[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2022. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [13] 汪磊. 基于SAR技术的矿区大梯度形变时序监测[D]. 徐州:中国矿业大学,2017. [WANG Lei. Time-series monitoring of large gradient mining subsidence based on SAR technology[D]. Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology,2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    WANG Lei. Time-series monitoring of large gradient mining subsidence based on SAR technology[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [14] 张椿雨,于冰,荆创利,等. SBAS-InSAR及其应用于准噶尔盆地独山子地区地表形变监测[J]. 测绘,2022,45(6):247 − 252. [ZHANG Chunyu,YU Bing,JING Chuangli,et al. SBAS-InSAR and its application for surface deformation monitoring in Dushanzi area of Junggar Basin[J]. Surveying and Mapping,2022,45(6):247 − 252. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    ZHANG Chunyu, YU Bing, JING Chuangli, et al. SBAS-InSAR and its application for surface deformation monitoring in Dushanzi area of Junggar Basin[J]. Surveying and Mapping, 2022, 45(6): 247 − 252. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [15]

    ZEBKER H A,ROSEN P. On the derivation of coseismic displacement fields using differential radar interferometry:The Landers earthquake[C]//Proceedings of IGARSS '94 - 1994 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Pasadena,CA,USA. IEEE,1994:286 − 288.

    [16]

    MASSONNET D,ROSSI M,CARMONA C,et al. The displacement field of the Landers earthquake mapped by radar interferometry[J]. \nat,1993,364(6433):138 − 142.

    [17] 鲁魏,杨斌,杨坤. 基于时序InSAR的西南科技大学地表形变监测与分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2023,34(2):61 − 72. [LU Wei,YANG Bin,YANG Kun. Surface deformation monitoring and analysis of southwest university of science and technology based on time series InSAR[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2023,34(2):61 − 72. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LU Wei, YANG Bin, YANG Kun. Surface deformation monitoring and analysis of southwest university of science and technology based on time series InSAR[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2023, 34(2): 61 − 72. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [18] 朱琳,宫辉力,李小娟,等. 区域地面塌陷研究进展与展望[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2024,51(4):167 − 177. [ZHU Lin,GONG Huili,LI Xiaojuan,et al. Research progress and prospect of land subsidence[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2024,51(4):167 − 177. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    ZHU Lin, GONG Huili, LI Xiaojuan, et al. Research progress and prospect of land subsidence[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2024, 51(4): 167 − 177. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [19] 葛伟丽,李元杰,张春明,等. 基于InSAR技术的内蒙古巴彦淖尔市采空地面塌陷演化特征及成因分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2022,49(4):198 − 206. [GE Weili,LI Yuanjie,ZHANG Chunming,et al. An attribution analysis of land subsidence features in the city of Bayannur in InnerMongolia based on InSAR[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2022,49(4):198 − 206. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    GE Weili, LI Yuanjie, ZHANG Chunming, et al. An attribution analysis of land subsidence features in the city of Bayannur in InnerMongolia based on InSAR[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2022, 49(4): 198 − 206. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [20]

    NATSUAKI R,NAGAI H,MOTOHKA T,et al. SAR interferometry using ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 data for the Mw 7.8 Gorkha,Nepal earthquake[J]. Earth,Planets and Space,2016,68(1):15.

    [21]

    GLENN N F,CARR J R. The use of geostatistics in relating soil moisture to RADARSAT-1 SAR data obtained over the Great Basin,Nevada,USA[J]. Computers & Geosciences,2003,29(5):577 − 586.

    [22] 李新新,沈震. 基于GM(1,1)模型的矿山开采沉陷预测[J]. 北京测绘,2015(6):62 − 64. [LI Xinxin,SHEN Zhen. Forecast of mining subsidence based on GM(1,1)model[J]. Beijing Surveying and Mapping,2015(6):62 − 64. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LI Xinxin, SHEN Zhen. Forecast of mining subsidence based on GM(1, 1)model[J]. Beijing Surveying and Mapping, 2015(6): 62 − 64. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [23] 朱建军,李志伟,胡俊. InSAR变形监测方法与研究进展[J]. 测绘学报,2017,46(10):1717 − 1733. [ZHU Jianjun,LI Zhiwei,HU Jun. Research progress and methods of InSAR for deformation monitoring[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica,2017,46(10):1717 − 1733. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    ZHU Jianjun, LI Zhiwei, HU Jun. Research progress and methods of InSAR for deformation monitoring[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2017, 46(10): 1717 − 1733. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [24] 朱建军,杨泽发,李志伟. InSAR矿区地表三维形变监测与预计研究进展[J]. 测绘学报,2019,48(2):135 − 144. [ZHU Jianjun,YANG Zefa,LI Zhiwei. Recent progress in retrieving and predicting mining-induced 3D displace-ments using InSAR[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica,2019,48(2):135 − 144. (in Chinese with English abstract)] DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2019.20180188

    ZHU Jianjun, YANG Zefa, LI Zhiwei. Recent progress in retrieving and predicting mining-induced 3D displace-ments using InSAR[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2019, 48(2): 135 − 144. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2019.20180188

    [25] 尹承深,刘全明,王福强. 基于Sentinel-1A SAR数据的呼和浩特城区地表形变分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2023,34(2):73 − 81. [YIN Chengshen,LIU Quanming,WANG Fuqiang. Surface deformation analysis of Hohhot urban area based on SAR data from Sentinel-1A[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2023,34(2):73 − 81. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    YIN Chengshen, LIU Quanming, WANG Fuqiang. Surface deformation analysis of Hohhot urban area based on SAR data from Sentinel-1A[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2023, 34(2): 73 − 81. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [26] 莫莉,王贤能. 基于PS-InSAR技术的后海深槽地面及建筑物形变监测分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2023,34(1):68 − 74. [MO Li,WANG Xianneng. Monitoring and analysis of ground and building settlement of deep trough in Houhai based on PS-InSAR technology[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2023,34(1):68 − 74. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    MO Li, WANG Xianneng. Monitoring and analysis of ground and building settlement of deep trough in Houhai based on PS-InSAR technology[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2023, 34(1): 68 − 74. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [27] 胡凤鸣,伍吉仓. 时序合成孔径雷达干涉测量的多级化解算[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(12):1817 − 1824. [HU Fengming,WU Jicang. A multi-level approach for multi-temporal interferometric synthetic aperture radar[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science),2019,47(12):1817 − 1824. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    HU Fengming, WU Jicang. A multi-level approach for multi-temporal interferometric synthetic aperture radar[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2019, 47(12): 1817 − 1824. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [28] 熊文秀,冯光财,李志伟,等. 顾及时空特性的SBAS高质量点选取算法[J]. 测绘学报,2015,44(11):1246 − 1254. [XIONG Wenxiu,FENG Guangcai,LI Zhiwei,et al. High quality targets selection in SBAS-InSAR technique by considering temporal and spatial characteristic[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica,2015,44(11):1246 − 1254. (in Chinese with English abstract)] DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2015.20140547

    XIONG Wenxiu, FENG Guangcai, LI Zhiwei, et al. High quality targets selection in SBAS-InSAR technique by considering temporal and spatial characteristic[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2015, 44(11): 1246 − 1254. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2015.20140547

    [29] 张童康,师芸,王剑辉,等. InSAR和改进支持向量机的沉陷预测模型分析[J]. 测绘科学,2021,46(11):63 − 70. [ZHANG Tongkang,SHI Yun,WANG Jianhui,et al. Analysis of subsidence prediction model based on InSAR and improved support vector machine[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping,2021,46(11):63 − 70. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    ZHANG Tongkang, SHI Yun, WANG Jianhui, et al. Analysis of subsidence prediction model based on InSAR and improved support vector machine[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2021, 46(11): 63 − 70. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [30] 何清,魏路,肖永红. 基于SBAS-InSAR技术的安徽亳州市采空地面塌陷时空分布特征与影响因素分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2023,34(5):81 − 90. [HE Qing,WEI Lu,XIAO Yonghong. Analysis of spatial-temporal distribution characteristics and influencing factors of land subsidence in Bozhou City,Anhui Province based on SBAS-InSAR technology[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2023,34(5):81 − 90. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    HE Qing, WEI Lu, XIAO Yonghong. Analysis of spatial-temporal distribution characteristics and influencing factors of land subsidence in Bozhou City, Anhui Province based on SBAS-InSAR technology[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2023, 34(5): 81 − 90. (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • 期刊类型引用(1)

    1. 彭双庆,刘朋飞,陈刚,王丽萍,张伟,罗文文,景熙亮. 信息量法与随机森林耦合模型和临界月平均降雨阈值的区域滑坡危险性评价与区划——以重庆市涪陵区为例. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2025(01): 131-145 . 本站查看

    其他类型引用(0)

图(11)  /  表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  118
  • HTML全文浏览量:  17
  • PDF下载量:  47
  • 被引次数: 1
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-02-25
  • 修回日期:  2024-05-09
  • 录用日期:  2024-07-02
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-07-15

目录

/

返回文章
返回