Investigation of the Structure and Dynamic Response of Granite Weathering Crust Slopes Based on Microtremor Recordings: A Case Study of a Landslide in Lishui, Zhejiang Province
-
摘要:
花岗岩风化壳边坡在我国东南地区广泛分布，极易在降雨条件下发生群发性滑坡，因此，花岗岩风化壳边坡结构探查和动力响应研究对此类地质灾害防治具有重要的意义。本文以浙江丽水某降雨诱发花岗岩风化壳滑坡为例，于2019年7月滑坡发生后开展现场调查，结果表明该边坡由粗粒花岗岩风化层和花岗闪长岩风化层组成；2024年11月开展边坡地脉动监测，基于地脉动HVSR法的分析表明边坡坡顶、坡腰、坡脚的卓越频率不同，基于HVSR法的边坡剪切波速反演结果表明边坡由外向内主要由花岗岩风化残积层、全-强-中风化层组成，存在2−3个可能演化为滑面的地下界面，边坡在坡向方位上具有最显著的放大效应，且随高程的增大，3～22 Hz内竖直向和4～60 Hz水平向放大效应显著增强，各台站间同频率上存在放大同步现象，这不利于动力荷载作用下边坡的稳定性，但跨频率间放大不同步，这有利于动力荷载作用下边坡的稳定性。
Abstract:Granite weathering crust slopes are widely distributed in southeastern China and are highly susceptible to mass landslides during rainy events. Investigating the structure of granite weathering crust slopes and studying the dynamic responses of these slopes are crucial for preventing and mitigating such geological disasters. This paper examines a landslide in Lishui, Zhejiang Province, with field investigations conducted in July 2019 immediately following the landslide event. The results indicate that the slope consists of a coarse-grained granite weathering layer and a granodiorite weathering layer. In November 2024, subsequent microtremor monitoring was carried out on the slope. Utilizing the Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratio (HVSR) method, the anlaysis identified distinct predominant frequencies at the top, middle, and base of the slope. Shear wave velocity inversion based on the HVSR method showed that from the exterior to the interior, the slope mainly consists of granite weathered residual soil layers and fully to moderately weathered layers, with 2-3 potential underground interfaces that could evolve into sliding surfaces. The slope exhibits the most significant amplification effect in the direction of the slope, and as the elevation increases, the amplification effects significantly intensify within the 3～22 Hz vertically and 4～60 Hz horizontally, with synchronization of amplification at the same frequencies across different stations, which is detrimental to the slope stability under dynamic loading. However, the asynchronization of amplification across different frequencies is beneficial to the stability of the slope under dynamic loading.
-
0. 引 言
近年来，中国建设开发了数十座软岩露天煤矿，在开采过程中采场及排土场均发生过一定规模的滑坡，对于采场底帮顺倾软岩边坡与顺倾软基底内排土场边坡滑坡灾害尤为严重。滑坡灾害直接影响剥采排工程的发展，造成人员伤害和设备损毁及地貌景观破坏，严重制约着露天矿的安全高效生产[1-2]，边坡稳定性治理问题已成为边坡工程领域亟待解决的难题之一。
目前国内外学者们应用不同理论对其展开大量有意义的研究，成果丰硕。王东等[3]综合运用极限平衡法及数值模拟法，分析了不同压帮高度下边坡稳定性变化规律，提出了逆倾软岩边坡变形的治理措施；刘子春等[4]以扎尼河露天矿为背景，通过分析扩帮、内排压角等治理措施的基础上，提出了一种条带式开采技术的边坡治理方案；陈毓等[5]采用ANSYS对黑山露天矿内排土场边坡稳定性和破坏机理进行了分析，揭示了内排土场滑坡模式为“坐落滑移式”滑动，运用削坡治理技术来保证内排土场稳定性；唐文亮等[6]系统分析了露天矿内排土场滑坡影响因素，提出了预留煤柱的滑坡治理方法；李伟[7]揭示了阴湾排土场边坡变形破坏机理并结合数值模拟法和极限平衡法，分析了内排不同压脚方案下边坡稳定性，提出了阴湾排土场滑坡治理措施；王刚等[8]基于有限元数值模拟法和极限平衡法，分析了边坡破坏机理并对边坡进行了稳定性计算，提出了削坡减载的治理措施。软岩露天煤矿采场边坡稳定性治理最经济有效的方式是内排追踪压帮，内排土场稳定是前提，但现有方法均是单一针对采场或排土场边坡稳定性分析和治理，未能同时兼顾采场与内排土场边坡的稳定性，对工程实际的指导性不强。
本文以贺斯格乌拉南露天煤矿首采区南帮为工程背景，在兼顾采场与内排土场边坡稳定性的基础上，提出了露天煤矿顺倾软岩边坡内排追踪压帮治理工程，为深入研究顺倾软岩露天煤矿边坡稳定性治理方法提供新的参考。
1. 边坡工程地质条件分析
贺斯格乌拉南露天煤矿设计生产能力为15 Mt/a，首采区南帮地层自上而下主要发育第四系、2煤组、2煤组与3煤组间夹石、3煤组、3煤组底板和盆地基底火山岩，含煤岩系主要以泥岩为主，全区可采的有2-1、3-1煤层，第四系以粉砂质黏土为主，局部夹黄-浅灰色细砂及含砾粗砂层，岩性较差，首采区土层赋存较薄，且其地层中多赋存软弱夹层，主要以3-1、3-4煤底板弱层主，属于典型的顺倾软岩边坡，岩土体物理力学指标如表1所示，典型工程地质剖面如图1所示。
表 1 岩土体物理力学指标Table 1. Physical and mechanical parameters of rock mass岩体名称 内摩擦角/（°） 黏聚力/kPa 容重/（kN·m−3） 弹性模量/MPa 泊松比 砂岩 26.00 65 19.6 35 0.42 粉质黏土 14.06 22 19.8 46 0.38 煤 29.00 85 12.1 40 0.35 泥岩 20.00 40 19.4 75 0.36 排弃物 14.49 20 19.0 60 0.40 弱层 6.00 0 19.1 20 0.42 回填岩石 20.00 40 19.0 − − 2. 采场底帮浅层边坡二维稳定性分析
影响顺倾软岩露天煤矿采场边坡稳定性的主控因素是弱层及其暴露长度，采用追踪压帮方式治理该类边坡稳定性时，可忽略软弱夹层为底界面的切层-顺层组合滑动模式[9-10]，仅考虑剪胀破坏模式。由于贺斯格乌拉南露天矿边坡体内赋存软弱夹层，主要以3-1、3-4煤底板弱层为主，顺倾角度大，岩质松软，对于此类边坡，浅部可通过平盘参数进行重新设计，深部必须利用三维效应，实现稳定性控制。可采用刚体极限平衡法中的剩余推力法对浅层边坡进行稳定性计算[11-12]。该方法的优点是可以用来计算求解给定任意边坡潜在滑面的稳定系数，并且可以考虑在复杂外力作用下的不同抗剪参数滑动岩体对边坡稳定性的影响。稳定系数求解公式为：
$$ {P_i} = \frac{{{W_i}\sin {\alpha _i}({W_i}\sin {\alpha _i}\tan {\varphi _i}) + {C_i}{L_i}}}{{{F_{\rm{s}}}}} + {\phi _i}{p_{i - 1}} $$ (1) $$ {\phi _i} = \frac{{\cos ({\alpha _{i - 1}} - {\alpha _i})\tan {\varphi _i}\sin ({\alpha _{i - 1}} - {\alpha _i})}}{{{F_{\rm{s}}}}} $$ (2) 式中：
${P_i}$ ——第$i$ 条块的剩余推力/kN；$ {W_i} $ ——第$i$ 条块的重量/（N·m−3）；$\alpha_i$ ——第$i$ 条块的滑面倾角/（°）；${\varphi _i}$ ——第$i$ 条块的推力传递系数；${C_i}$ ——第$i$ 条块的滑面黏聚力/kPa；${L_i}$ ——第$i$ 条块的底面长度/m；${\phi _i}$ ——第$i$ 条块的滑面摩擦角/（°）；${F_{\rm{s}}}$ ——稳定性系数。依据《煤炭工业露天矿设计规范》（GB 50197―2015）[13]综合考虑贺斯格乌拉南露天煤矿首采区南帮边坡服务年限、地质条件与力学参数的可靠性、潜在滑坡危害程度等，确定安全储备系数为1.2。
由于南帮压覆大量煤层，在保证安全前提下，为实现最大限度回采压覆的煤炭资源，需要对边坡形态重新设计。本文选取典型剖面为研究对象，浅层边坡形态按照40 m运输平盘、15 m保安平盘进行设计，深部利用横采内排三维支挡效应回采采场底帮深部压覆煤炭资源。通过上述情况对浅层边坡进行了分析，边坡稳定性计算结果如图2所示。
![]()
图 2 浅层边二维坡稳定性计算结果Figure 2. Calculation results of two-dimensional slope stability of the shallow side分析图2可知，浅部边坡形态可按照40 m运输平盘、15 m保安平盘进行设计，由于弱层上部存在煤岩支挡，边坡潜在滑坡模式为以圆弧为侧界面、3-1煤底板弱层为底界面、沿边坡坡脚处剪出，此时，浅层边坡能满足安全储备系数1.2的要求。
3. 采场底帮深部边坡稳定性三维效应分析
基于浅层边坡二维稳定性分析结果可知，实现深部稳定性控制，必须借助横采工作帮与内排土场的双重支挡作用进行压煤回采，因此提出了利用横采内排三维支挡效应回采采场深部压覆煤炭资源[14]。本文借助FLAC3D数值模拟软件，分析不同降深角度和不同追踪距离条件下的边坡三维稳定性，以期获得最优的边坡空间形态参数。
（1） 模型的建立
考虑到FLAC3D建模较为复杂，采用CAD与Rhino相结合的方法，首先在CAD中对剖面进行整理，然后在Rhino软件中进行模型成体与网格划分的处理，并用Griddle将网格导出，生成精细的六面体网格模型[15 − 17]，最后导入采用于FLAC3D进行数值模拟计算。为尽可能凸显边坡稳定性的三维效应，以南帮断面形态设计边坡为数值模拟对象，共计建立15种工况模型，模型如图3，追踪距离分别为50，100，200，300，400 m。为避免边界效应，在模型的底部和两侧分别施加水平和垂直位移约束，加载方式为重力加载[18]。
（2） 计算结果分析
由于计算结果过多，本文仅列举降深角度α=29°，追踪距离50，200，400 m工况下边坡位移云图（切割位置为沿模型走向中间处），如图4所示。南帮边坡三维稳定性计算结果如图5所示。
![]()
图 5 追踪距离与边坡稳定系数的关系曲线Figure 5. Relationship curve between tracking distance and slope stability coefficient分析图4、图5可知，追踪距离50 m时，三维支挡效应显著，边坡深部位移明显小于上部，发生以圆弧为侧界面、3-1煤底板弱层为底界面的切层-顺层-剪出滑动，稳定系数大于1.2。当追踪距离大于50 m时，通过对比分析不同深部边坡角（α）条件下的数值模拟结果可知，深部边坡角对边坡稳定性系数影响较小，随着追踪距离的增加，边坡的破坏模式过渡为以圆弧为侧界面、3-1煤底板弱层为底界面的切层-顺层滑动，并且此时边坡的稳定性不满足安全储备系数1.2要求。因此，内排土场追踪距离需控制在50 m以内，深部边坡角设计为29°。
4. 内排土场压帮边坡稳定性分析与治理
露天矿内排土场边坡稳定的主控因素是软弱基底，软弱基底分为自身软弱岩土层和受外界条影响转变为软弱岩土层2种类型。排土场下沉是软弱基底内排土场失稳的特征，主要现象是含有纵向强烈挤压区，基底上部岩层隆起，地面出现滑坡等[19 − 21]。在保证采场南帮安全的前提下降深至3-1煤底板，须借助横采工作帮与内排土场的双重支挡作用，内排土场稳定是前提[22]。由于内排土场基底为3-1、3-4煤底板弱层，顺倾角度较大，按照内排土场设计参数，其稳定性无法满足安全储备系数的要求[23]。从提供基底强度角度出发，采用破坏弱层回填岩石的方式提高内排土场边坡稳定性。按照排土台阶高度24 m、平盘宽度60 m、坡面角33°对不同内排压帮标高边坡稳定性进行试算，确定内排最小压帮标高为+844水平，因此本文分析了内排基于+844水平的压帮高度下内排土场基底不同的处理方式时的边坡稳定性计算结果如图6—7所示，边坡稳定性与破坏弱层回填岩石范围关系曲线如图8所示。
![]()
图 6 3-1煤层内排基底不同处理方式下边坡稳定性计算结果Figure 6. Calculation results of slope stability under different treatment methods of inner row basement (3-1)分析图6—图8可知，当内排基于+844的压帮高度，内排基底3-1底板弱层完全破坏并回填岩石，破坏3-4底板弱层并回填岩石倾向长度达60 m时，内排土场及其与采场南帮复合边坡稳定性均可满足安全系数1.2要求。边坡稳定性随破坏底板弱层回填岩石范围的增大呈正指数函数规律提高，随着回填岩石范围长度的不断增加，边坡稳定性系数不断提高。采用破坏弱层回填岩石的基底处理方法，既保证了边坡的稳定又规避了过渡处理基底的生产成本。
![]()
图 7 3-4煤层内排基底不同处理方式下边坡稳定性计算结果Figure 7. Calculation results of slope stability under different treatment methods of inner row basement (3-4)![]()
图 8 边坡稳定性与破坏弱层回填岩石范围关系曲线Figure 8. Relationship curve between slope stability and the extent of backfill rocks in the weak layer5. 结 论
（1） 弱层暴露长度是露天矿顺倾软岩边坡稳定性的主控因素，据此提出了露天矿顺倾软岩边坡内排追踪压帮治理工程，可最大限度的安全回收边坡压覆煤炭资源。
（2） 控制采场与内排土场间的追踪距离是改善边坡稳定性的有效途径。随着追踪距离的增加，边坡破坏模式从以圆弧为侧界面、弱层为底界面的切层-顺层-剪出滑动逐渐过渡为以圆弧为侧界面、弱层为底界面的切层-顺层滑动。
（3） 内排土场及其与采场构成的复合边坡稳定性随破坏底板弱层回填岩石范围的增大呈指数函数规律提高，随着回填岩石范围长度的不断增加，边坡稳定性系数不断提高。
（4） 贺斯格乌拉南露天煤矿首采区南帮浅部边坡留设40 m运输平盘、15 m保安平盘，底帮深部边坡角29°，追踪距离控制在50 m之内时可满足安全要求；内排基底弱层完全破坏并回填岩石倾向长度60 m时可满足安全需求。
-
![]()
图 1 2019年浙江丽水降雨型滑坡和本文研究案例位置
Figure 1. Rainfall-induced landslides in Lishui, Zhejiang Province in 2019, and the location of the study site
![]()
图 2 浙江丽水研究案例边坡（a）2019年7月13日和（b）2024年11月22日现场图及地震仪布设位置图
Figure 2. Field Images of the Study Slope in Lishui, Zhejiang: (a) July 13, 2019, and (b) November 22, 2024, Including the Layout of Seismometer Stations for Microtremor Recordings
![]()
图 3 研究案例典型全/强风化（a）粗粒花岗岩和（b）花岗闪长岩
Figure 3. Examples of Fully and/or Strongly Weathered (a) Coarse Granite and (b) Granodiorite from the Study Slope
![]()
图 4 地脉动HVSR谱随时间的变化
Figure 4. Time-dependent variation of HVSR spectra at three monitoring stations
![]()
图 5 各台站的平均HVSR谱及卓越频率
Figure 5. Average HVSR spectra and predominant frequencies at each station
![]()
图 6 根据图5中HVSR谱反演的边坡剪切波速Vs剖面
Figure 6. The S-wave velocity (Vs) cross-section profile of the slope inverted from the HVSR spectra shown in Fig. 5
![]()
图 8 坡顶台站S1和坡腰台站S2在（a）竖直向和（b）水平向与坡脚台站竖直向的放大效应
Figure 8. Amplification effects at Top Slope Station S1 and Mid-Slope Station S2 in (a) Vertical and (b) Horizontal Directions Compared to the Vertical Component at Base Slope Station S3
-
[1] 王德滋,沈渭洲. 中国东南部花岗岩成因与地壳演化[J]. 地学前缘,2003,10(3):209 − 220. [WANG Dezi,SHEN Weizhou. Genesis of granitoids and crustal evolution in southEast China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2003,10(3):209 − 220. (in Chinese with English abstract)] WANG Dezi, SHEN Weizhou. Genesis of granitoids and crustal evolution in southEast China［J］. Earth Science Frontiers, 2003, 10（3）: 209 − 220. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[2] 舒良树. 华南构造演化的基本特征[J]. 地质通报,2012,31(7):1035 − 1053. [SHU Liangshu. An analysis of principal features of tectonic evolution in South China Block[J]. Geological Bulletin of China,2012,31(7):1035 − 1053. (in Chinese with English abstract)] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2012.07.003 SHU Liangshu. An analysis of principal features of tectonic evolution in South China Block［J］. Geological Bulletin of China, 2012, 31（7）: 1035 − 1053. （in Chinese with English abstract） DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2012.07.003
[3] GILDER S A,GILL J,COE R S,et al. Isotopic and paleomagnetic constraints on the Mesozoic tectonic evolution of South China[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,1996,101(B7):16137 − 16154. DOI: 10.1029/96JB00662
[4] 陈春利,方志伟. 福建省地质灾害气象预警有效降雨模型研究[J]. 地质力学学报,2023,29(1):99 − 110. [CHEN Chunli,FANG Zhiwei. Research on an effective rainfall model for geological disaster early warning in Fujian Province,China[J]. Journal of Geomechanics,2023,29(1):99 − 110. (in Chinese with English abstract)] DOI: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2022090 CHEN Chunli, FANG Zhiwei. Research on an effective rainfall model for geological disaster early warning in Fujian Province, China［J］. Journal of Geomechanics, 2023, 29（1）: 99 − 110. （in Chinese with English abstract） DOI: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2022090
[5] 尚彦军,吴宏伟,曲永新. 花岗岩风化程度的化学指标及微观特征对比——以香港九龙地区为例[J]. 地质科学,2001,36(3):279 − 294. [SHANG Yanjun,WU Hongwei,QU Yongxin. Comparison of chemical indices and micro- properties of weathering degrees of granitic rocks:A case study from Kowloon,Hong Kong[J]. Scientia Geologica Sinica,2001,36(3):279 − 294. (in Chinese with English abstract)] SHANG Yanjun, WU Hongwei, QU Yongxin. Comparison of chemical indices and micro- properties of weathering degrees of granitic rocks: A case study from Kowloon, Hong Kong［J］. Scientia Geologica Sinica, 2001, 36（3）: 279 − 294. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[6] 吴仕川. 花岗岩风化带的野外划分方法[J]. 土工基础,2013,27(6):105 − 106. [WU Shichuan. Field classification of granite weathering zone[J]. Soil Engineering and Foundation,2013,27(6):105 − 106. (in Chinese with English abstract)] WU Shichuan. Field classification of granite weathering zone［J］. Soil Engineering and Foundation, 2013, 27（6）: 105 − 106. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[7] 吴宏伟,尚彦军,曲永新,等. 香港花岗岩风化分级化学指标体系与风化壳分带[J]. 工程地质学报,1999,7(2):125 − 134. [WU Hongwei,SHANG Yanjun,QU Yongxin,et al. Chemical weathering indices,classification,and zoning of weathered granitic rock in Hong Kong[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,1999,7(2):125 − 134. (in Chinese)] WU Hongwei, SHANG Yanjun, QU Yongxin, et al. Chemical weathering indices, classification, and zoning of weathered granitic rock in Hong Kong［J］. Journal of Engineering Geology, 1999, 7（2）: 125 − 134. （in Chinese）
[8] 王清,唐大雄,张庆云,等. 中国东部花岗岩残积土物质成分和结构特征的研究[J]. 长春地质学院学报,1991,21(1):73 − 81. [WANG Qing,TANG Daxiong,ZHANG Qingyun,et al. A study on the structure and composition of granite residual soil in the Eastern China[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),1991,21(1):73 − 81. (in Chinese with English abstract)] WANG Qing, TANG Daxiong, ZHANG Qingyun, et al. A study on the structure and composition of granite residual soil in the Eastern China［J］. Journal of Jilin University （Earth Science Edition）, 1991, 21（1）: 73 − 81. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[9] 王清,蒋惠忠,唐大雄. 闽南三角地区花岗岩残积土及其工程地质特性的研究[J]. 福建地质,1990,9(2):90 − 99. [WANG Qing,JIANG Huizhong,TANG Daxiong. A study on engineering geological properties of granitic residual soil in south Fujian[J]. Geology of Fujian,1990,9(2):90 − 99. (in Chinese with English abstract)] WANG Qing, JIANG Huizhong, TANG Daxiong. A study on engineering geological properties of granitic residual soil in south Fujian［J］. Geology of Fujian, 1990, 9（2）: 90 − 99. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[10] 简文彬,陈文庆,郑登贤. 花岗岩残积土的崩解试验研究[C]//中国土木工程学会第九届土力学及岩土工程学术会议论文集(上册). 北京,2003:312-315. [11] 简文彬,胡海瑞,罗阳华,等. 干湿循环下花岗岩残积土强度衰减试验研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2017,25(3):592 − 597. [JIAN Wenbin,HU Hairui,LUO Yanghua,et al. Experimental study on deterioration of granitic residual soil strength in wetting-drying cycles[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2017,25(3):592 − 597. (in Chinese with English abstract)] JIAN Wenbin, HU Hairui, LUO Yanghua, et al. Experimental study on deterioration of granitic residual soil strength in wetting-drying cycles［J］. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2017, 25（3）: 592 − 597. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[12] 吴能森. 花岗岩残积土的崩解性及软化损伤参数研究[J]. 河北建筑科技学院学报,2006,23(3):58 − 62. [WU Nengsen. A study on calving property and softening damage parameter of GRS[J]. Journal of Hebei Institute of Architectural Science and Technology,2006,23(3):58 − 62. (in Chinese with English abstract)] WU Nengsen. A study on calving property and softening damage parameter of GRS［J］. Journal of Hebei Institute of Architectural Science and Technology, 2006, 23（3）: 58 − 62. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[13] 张抒. 广州地区花岗岩残积土崩解特性研究[D]. 武汉:中国地质大学,2009. [ZHANG Shu. Study on disintegration characteristics of granite residual soil in Guangzhou area[D]. Wuhan:China University of Geosciences,2009. (in Chinese with English abstract)] ZHANG Shu. Study on disintegration characteristics of granite residual soil in Guangzhou area［D］. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences, 2009. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[14] 张抒,唐辉明. 非饱和花岗岩残积土崩解机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2013,34(6):1668 − 1674. [ZHANG Shu,TANG Huiming. Experimental study of disintegration mechanism for unsaturated granite residual soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2013,34(6):1668 − 1674. (in Chinese with English abstract)] ZHANG Shu, TANG Huiming. Experimental study of disintegration mechanism for unsaturated granite residual soil［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34（6）: 1668 − 1674. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[15] 王深法,王援高,胡珍珍. 浙江山地滑坡现状及其成因[J]. 山地学报,2000,18(4):373 − 376. [WANG Shenfa,WANG Yuangao,HU Zhenzhen. Actuality of hill sliding and its cause in the mountainous region of Zhejiang province[J]. Journal of Mountain Research,2000,18(4):373 − 376. (in Chinese with English abstract)] WANG Shenfa, WANG Yuangao, HU Zhenzhen. Actuality of hill sliding and its cause in the mountainous region of Zhejiang province［J］. Journal of Mountain Research, 2000, 18（4）: 373 − 376. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[16] 詹良通,李鹤,陈云敏,等. 东南沿海残积土地区降雨诱发型滑坡预报雨强-历时曲线的影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学,2012,33(3):872 − 880. [ZHAN Liangtong,LI He,CHEN Yunmin,et al. Parametric analyses of intensity-duration curve for predicting rainfall-induced landslides in residual soil slope in Southeastern coastal areas of China[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2012,33(3):872 − 880. (in Chinese with English abstract)] ZHAN Liangtong, LI He, CHEN Yunmin, et al. Parametric analyses of intensity-duration curve for predicting rainfall-induced landslides in residual soil slope in Southeastern coastal areas of China［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33（3）: 872 − 880. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[17] 岳中琦. 梅大高速公路路基边坡失稳条件与滑坡机理初探[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2024,35(4):1 − 12. [YUE Zhongqi. Study on the instability condition and landslide mechanism of subgrade slope in Mei–Da Expressway[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2024,35(4):1 − 12. (in Chinese with English abstract)] YUE Zhongqi. Study on the instability condition and landslide mechanism of subgrade slope in Mei–Da Expressway［J］. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2024, 35（4）: 1 − 12. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[18] 曾新雄,刘佳,赖波,等. 广东珠海市降雨型崩塌滑坡预警阈值研究[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2024,35(5):141 − 150. [ZENG Xinxiong,LIU Jia,LAI Bo,et al. Study on warning rainfall threshold for rainfall-induced collapses and landslide geological hazards in Zhuhai City,Guangdong Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2024,35(5):141 − 150. (in Chinese with English abstract)] ZENG Xinxiong, LIU Jia, LAI Bo, et al. Study on warning rainfall threshold for rainfall-induced collapses and landslide geological hazards in Zhuhai City, Guangdong Province［J］. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2024, 35（5）: 141 − 150. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[19] 栗倩倩,王伟,黄亮,等. 台风暴雨型滑坡滞后效应分析——以浙江青田县“利奇马” 台风为例[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2022,33(6):10 − 19. [LI Qianqian,WANG Wei,HUANG Liang,et al. Analysis on lag effect of typhoon-induced landslide:A case study of typhoon “Lekima” in Qingtian County,Zhejiang Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2022,33(6):10 − 19. (in Chinese with English abstract)] LI Qianqian, WANG Wei, HUANG Liang, et al. Analysis on lag effect of typhoon-induced landslide: A case study of typhoon “Lekima” in Qingtian County, Zhejiang Province［J］. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33（6）: 10 − 19. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[20] 周诗凯,刘正华,余丰华,等. 浙江省地质灾害气象风险预警一体化建设的探索与实践[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2024,35(2):21 − 29. [ZHOU Shikai,LIU Zhenghua,YU Fenghua,et al. Exploration and practice of integrated construction of meteorological risk warning for geological hazards in Zhejiang Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2024,35(2):21 − 29. (in Chinese with English abstract)] ZHOU Shikai, LIU Zhenghua, YU Fenghua, et al. Exploration and practice of integrated construction of meteorological risk warning for geological hazards in Zhejiang Province［J］. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2024, 35（2）: 21 − 29. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[21] 魏平新,郑志文,周志华,等. 广东省暴雨型浅层滑坡灾害动力预警模型与气象风险预警研究[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2024,35(2):30 − 39. [WEI Pingxin,ZHENG Zhiwen,ZHOU Zhihua,et al. Research on risk early warning for rainfall-induced shallow landslides in Guangdong Province based on a dynamic slope instability model[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2024,35(2):30 − 39. (in Chinese with English abstract)] WEI Pingxin, ZHENG Zhiwen, ZHOU Zhihua, et al. Research on risk early warning for rainfall-induced shallow landslides in Guangdong Province based on a dynamic slope instability model［J］. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2024, 35（2）: 30 − 39. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[22] 薛翊国,李术才,苏茂鑫,等. 厚层堆积层滑坡滑面的综合探测技术及其应用[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2013,24(3):43 − 53. [XUE Yiguo,LI Shucai,SU Maoxin,et al. Comprehensive detection technologies and their implementation on slip plane in thick colluvium landslide[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2013,24(3):43 − 53. (in Chinese with English abstract)] XUE Yiguo, LI Shucai, SU Maoxin, et al. Comprehensive detection technologies and their implementation on slip plane in thick colluvium landslide［J］. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2013, 24（3）: 43 − 53. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[23] 陈松,陈长敬,吴俊,等. 物探方法在强风化区填图中的应用探索[J]. 地质力学学报,2017,23(2):206 − 213. [CHEN Song,CHEN Changjing,WU Jun,et al. Application and exploration of geophysical methods in geological mapping in strongly weathered area[J]. Journal of Geomechanics,2017,23(2):206 − 213. (in Chinese with English abstract)] CHEN Song, CHEN Changjing, WU Jun, et al. Application and exploration of geophysical methods in geological mapping in strongly weathered area［J］. Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 23（2）: 206 − 213. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[24] SHAPIRO N M,CAMPILLO M,STEHLY L,et al. High-resolution surface-wave tomography from ambient seismic noise[J]. Science,2005,307(5715):1615 − 1618. DOI: 10.1126/science.1108339
[25] WANG Shuang,SUN Xinlei,LIU Lanbo,et al. Sub-surface structures and site effects extracted from ambient noise in metropolitan Guangzhou,China[J]. Engineering Geology,2020,268:105526. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105526
[26] CHEN Chunte,KUO C H,LIN Chemin,et al. Investigation of shallow S-wave velocity structure and site response parameters in Taiwan by using high-density microtremor measurements[J]. Engineering Geology,2022,297:106498. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106498
[27] OKADA H. The Microtremor Survey Method,Geophysical Monograph Series,12. Society of Exploration Geophysicists,Tulsa,2003.
[28] NAKAMURA Y. A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. QR of RTRI,1989,30:25 − 33.
[29] NAKAMURA Y. What is the Nakakura method? Seismol. Res. Lett. ,2019,90:1437 − 1443.
[30] NAKUMURA Y. On the H/V spectrum. In:The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. October 12 − 17,2008,Beijing,China.
[31] MOON S W,SUBRAMANIAM P,ZHANG Yunhuo,et al. Bedrock depth evaluation using microtremor measurement:Empirical guidelines at weathered granite formation in Singapore[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics,2019,171:103866. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.103866
[32] BARD P-Y. Microtremor measurements:A tool for site effect estimation?. In:Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. on the Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion,Yokohama,Japan,1 − 3 December 1998,19991,pp. 1251 − 1279.
[33] BODIN P,SMITH K,HORTON S,et al. Microtremor observations of deep sediment resonance in metropolitan Memphis,Tennessee[J]. Engineering Geology,2001,62(1/2/3):159 − 168.
[34] ACERRA C,HAVENITH H,ZACHAROPOULOS S. Guidelines for the implementation of the H/V spectral ratio technique on ambient vibrations measurements,processing and interpretation[J]. SESAME European Research Project EVG1-CT-2000-00026,D23.12,2004.
[35] GUO Zhen,ZHOU Mi,HUANG Yu,et al. Monitoring performance of slopes via ambient seismic noise recordings:Case study in a colluvium deposit[J]. Engineering Geology,2023,324:107268. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107268
[36] 刘俊辰,王文沛,高杨,等. 强震条件下西藏则隆弄沟高位滑坡失稳特征研究[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2024,35(6):15 − 23. [LIU Junchen,WANG Wenpei,GAO Yang,et al. Study on the unstable characteristics of high-level landslide in Zelongnong Gou,Xizang under severe earthquakes[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2024,35(6):15 − 23. (in Chinese with English abstract)] LIU Junchen, WANG Wenpei, GAO Yang, et al. Study on the unstable characteristics of high-level landslide in Zelongnong Gou, Xizang under severe earthquakes［J］. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2024, 35（6）: 15 − 23. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[37] 王来贵,孙颖聪,赵娜,等. 地震作用下含弱层顺向坡响应规律分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2024,35(3):26 − 35. [WANG Laigui,SUN Yingcong,ZHAO Na,et al. Analysis on the response of the dip slope with weak layer to earthquake[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2024,35(3):26 − 35. (in Chinese with English abstract)] WANG Laigui, SUN Yingcong, ZHAO Na, et al. Analysis on the response of the dip slope with weak layer to earthquake［J］. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2024, 35（3）: 26 − 35. （in Chinese with English abstract）
[38] GUO Zhen,AYDIN A,HUANG Yu,et al. Polarization characteristics of Rayleigh waves to improve seismic site effects analysis by HVSR method[J]. Engineering Geology,2021,292:106274. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106274
[39] GUO Zhen,XUE Mei,AYDIN A,et al. Locating the source regions of the single and double-frequency microseisms to investigate the source effects on HVSR in site effect analysis[J]. Journal of Earth Science,2022,33(5):1219 − 1232. DOI: 10.1007/s12583-021-1501-4
[40] KONNO K,OHMACHI T. Ground-motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor[J]. The Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,1998,88(1):228 − 241. DOI: 10.1785/BSSA0880010228
[41] KRAMER S. Geotechnical earthquake engineering,1996,Prentice Hall,Upper Saddle River,NJ 07458.
-
期刊类型引用(1)
1. 管少杰，吕进国，王康，张砚力. 露天矿下伏采空区距坡脚水平距离对边坡稳定性的影响. 工矿自动化. 2025(02): 113-120 . 
百度学术
其他类型引用(0)
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 0
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 1
邮件订阅
RSS