ISSN 1003-8035 CN 11-2852/P

    考虑岩体结构与生态根植带效应的秦岭北麓泥石流危险性评价

    Debris-flow hazard assessment in the northern foothills of the Qinling mountains based on a cloud model

    • 摘要: 泥石流易发性与危险性评价是泥石流灾害防治与风险管理的重要基础。针对传统评价方法中岩体结构破碎性和生态根植带作用表征不足、指标赋权主观性较强及评价不确定性刻画不足等问题,以秦岭北麓西安辖区为例,提出一种融合机理解释与不确定性表达的泥石流综合评价方法。选取相对高差、平均坡度、流域面积、距断层距离、崩滑密度、风化层厚度、NDVI、植被类型和岩石脆弱性指数9个评价因子,采用频率比方法进行量化,并通过CRITIC–AUC混合方法确定因子权重;结合多维云模型刻画易发性等级的随机性与模糊性,并引入降雨诱发因子完成危险性评价。结果表明,易发性评价AUC值为0.8652,模型具有较好的判别能力。极高危险区面积约542 km2,占研究区总面积的9.88%,主要集中于山前陡坡带和深切割沟谷区域。灾点密度随危险等级升高明显增加,其中极高危险区灾点密度为0.0592,高危险区为0.0138,低危险区和极低危险区接近于0。岩石脆弱性指数、风化层厚度、NDVI和植被类型等因子具有较高贡献,说明岩体风化破碎、松散物源供给和生态根植带差异共同影响泥石流危险性空间分异。考虑岩体结构与生态根植带效应的CRITIC–AUC–多维云模型能够较好识别泥石流高危险流域,并增强评价结果的机理解释能力。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective Debris-flow susceptibility and hazard assessment are important foundations for debris-flow prevention and risk management. To address insufficient representation of rock-mass fragmentation and ecological root-zone effects, strong subjectivity in index weighting, and inadequate uncertainty characterization in traditional methods, this study proposes a comprehensive debris-flow assessment method that integrates mechanism interpretation with uncertainty expression, taking the Xi'an section of the northern foothills of the Qinling Mountains as the study area.
      Methods Nine evaluation factors were selected: relative relief, average slope, watershed area, distance to faults, landslide-collapse density, weathering-layer thickness, NDVI, vegetation type, and rock vulnerability index. The frequency ratio method was used for factor quantification, and factor weights were determined using a CRITIC-AUC hybrid weighting method. A multidimensional cloud model was used to characterize the randomness and fuzziness of susceptibility grades, and rainfall-triggering factors were incorporated to complete the hazard assessment.
      Results The susceptibility assessment achieved an AUC value of 0.8652, indicating good discriminative capability. Extremely high-hazard zones covered approximately 542 km2, accounting for 9.88% of the study area, and were mainly distributed in piedmont steep-slope zones and deeply incised gullies. Hazard-site density increased markedly with hazard level, reaching 0.0592 in extremely high-hazard zones and 0.0138 in high-hazard zones, while values in low- and extremely low-hazard zones were close to zero. The rock vulnerability index, weathering-layer thickness, NDVI, and vegetation type contributed strongly, indicating that rock weathering and fragmentation, loose material supply, and ecological root-zone differences jointly control spatial differentiation of debris-flow hazard.
      Conclusion The CRITIC-AUC-multidimensional cloud model considering rock-mass structure and ecological root-zone effects can effectively identify high-hazard debris-flow watersheds and improve the mechanistic interpretability of the assessment results.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回